The National Midnight Star #219

Errors-To: rush-request@syrinx.umd.edu Reply-To: rush@syrinx.umd.edu Sender: rush-request@syrinx.umd.edu Precedence: bulk From: rush@syrinx.umd.edu To: rush_mailing_list Subject: 04/19/91 - The National Midnight Star #219
** ____ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ** ** / /_/ /_ /\ / /__/ / / / / /\ / /__/ / ** ** / / / /__ / \/ / / / / /__/ / \/ / / /___ ** ** ** ** __ ___ ____ ** ** /\ /\ / / \ /\ / / / _ /__/ / ** ** / \/ \ / /___/ / \/ / /___/ / / / ** ** ** ** ____ ____ ___ ___ ** ** /__ / /__/ /__/ ** ** ____/ / / / / \ ** The National Midnight Star, Number 219 Friday, 19 April 1991 Today's Topics: Trees, Canadians and Opening Songs (none) Re: PROGRESSIVE stuff Rush posers Witch Hunt quit SUN audio files (none) Rand and 2112 literary interpretations Re: 04/18/91 - The National Midnight Star #218 Marillion 2112 and Trees and a few other things Opening bands getting booed off stage Neil on Witch Hunt ---------------------------------------------------------- From: amy@arla.austin.mcd.mot.com (Amy Moseley) Subject: Trees, Canadians and Opening Songs Date: Thu, 18 Apr 91 14:12:05 CDT Ok. Regarding the Trees: Here's an obligatory Jack Secret paraphase. My brother, his friends and I met him before the Hold Your Fire tour in Austin, Texas. Jack says that everybody reads way too much into every song. One thing people seem to miss is the incredible influence Rush's nationality, Canadian, has on their outlook. He says Rush admires America and especially baseball and the space shuttle ("'Countdown'" was a tribute to America") but all Canadians at one time feel slighted by their huge neighbo(u)r, who doesn't seem to notice Canada's existence. The Maples obviously are Canadians and the Oaks, Americans. Canada has tried often to cut Americans down to Canadian size, through the enforcement of Canadian Content laws (at least 30% of all music played on Canadian radio _must_ be Canadian in origin, although the qualifications for CanCon are slight (i. e. producer Canadian)). Also Canada has been torn internally between two different groups, the French and English speng peoples. More obvious Canadianisms: * Territories--Canadians are not big flag wavers; in fact they didn't have their own distinctive maple flag until the last 20 years or so. They are understated and dislike excess. I realize I am stereotyping a nation but I'm trying to outline some differences. In the last few years there has been a rise in Canadian nationalism, which many Canadians abhor. See soc. culture.canada. Canadians do not favour the excess of Americans but at the same time they feel trapped because they are so ignored by the rest of North America. If you want to please Rush and all Canadians read soc.culture.canada. *Lakeside Park--everybody gathers on the twenty-fourth of May to celebrate Victoria Day, a Canadian holiday. It's the first holiday of the summer season and children especially like it because in older times it was the first day they could safely put away winter underwear! Finally, about the Rush openers: my brother and friends got this one. Rush always opened the live shows with the first song off the _third_ album of the four that made up a live album. So, Bastille Day for ATWAS, Spirit of Radio for ESL, and finally, The Big Money for ASOH. My brother predicted The Big Money would be the opener before it actually was. -- Amy J. Moseley Motorola Computer Group (512) 891-2426 :) amy@austin.mcd.mot.com or uunet!cs.utexas.edu!oakhill!arla!amy ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: 18 Apr 91 16:28:00 EDT From: "MAPLE::SPECTRE" <spectre%maple.decnet@pine.circa.ufl.edu> Please remove me from the mailing list. As much as I love Rush and enjoy the NMS, the mailings are filling up my disk quota before i can even read them. Thanx, Jerry ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 91 16:23:26 EDT From: Macon N. Pegram <csc8mnp@cabell.vcu.edu> Subject: Re: PROGRESSIVE stuff Hmmmmm.....I don't know what recent incident has sparked this unexpected response, or if all of you were merely sleeping for the past month. I certainly thank you all for your interest in such a list, but that announce- ment was made at least a month ago, and since then, it has come to light that there already existed such a mailing list, so I abandoned the one I was working on and joined that one instead, as well as telling everyone who had posted to me at that point to do the same. This list is very thurough one, ranging from discussing King Crimson and IQ to more obscure bands such as Eloy and Starcastle... I suggest all of you join it, if you are still interested in being on such a list. It's addr is - gibraltar-request@gong.mitre.org <---- admin. addr write Micheal and he'll do the rest. thanks the grinch [ The reason was that the Prog. group announcement was sent to me, and asked it be forwarded to the list. Because of work backups and list problems, the announcement was delayed. Apparently in that time, the list was dissolved, but nobody told me. I sent the announcement out as a special edition of the NMS, that's why you're getting responses. :rush-mgr ] ---------------------------------------------------------- From: cfabrams@eos.ncsu.edu Subject: Rush posers Date: Thu, 18 Apr 91 17:44:50 EDT A note to ponder: I, like many college students, live in a dorm, where I am exposed to many different people and opinions, especially on music. My ex-roommate had tastes that ran from Terence Trent Darby and James Taylor to Too $hort and Slayer. Most guys on the hall listen to wimpy bullcrap music like Top Forty. Some like Led Zeppelin, but for all the wrong reasons (so they can get laid). They listen to music for one sole reason--to impress other people. Not that this is a bad reason, we all are like that to some extent, but they exclude they quality of "music" as an art form. There's this one guy who said he liked Rush. "Well, what's your favorite song?" I asked him, hoping to start an interesting discussion. "Tom Sawyer, man," he said. I guess he really didn't understand why I rolled my eyes. Are there any "hardcore" rush fans who think Tom Sawyer is the best Rush song ever? I admit the keyboard is catchy, and that's probably what many people think of when they think of Rush. It's the Zeppelin equivalent to saying "Yeah, man, I love Led Zep--Stairway to Heaven rules!!" Give me a break! Next time someone says they like Rush because of Tom Sawyer, ask him/her which album it's on. You may, like me, get an answer like, "You mean it's not on Presto?" cAm "Invisible to telescopic eye....." cfabrams@eos.ncsu.edu ---------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Witch Hunt Date: Thu, 18 Apr 91 17:55:19 EDT From: mjkobb@media-lab.media.mit.edu Greetings, In the last issue, Rob Simmon writes: > On an interview two years or so ago (the series about important albums with >Red whoever) they discussed moving pictures, and described the recording of >witchunt. Apparently, they went out into the environs of Le Studio and got a >little drunk, and recorded twleve tracks of neil ranting and raving & the rest >of the band plus the stiudio staff carrying along with neil. they translation >is rather difficult: i.e. impossible.then mixed the tracks specifically to >hide what was said. From experience,translation is rather difficult: i.e. >impossible. I agree that it's very difficult to understand what is said there, and in fact, most of it is totally impossible. However, I'd swear I can make out the words "We've got to protect our children!" in there somewhere. I'll have to check the CD when I get home to find the specific time. Other than that phrase, I can't understand any of it... --Mike ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 91 17:34:54 -0500 From: koldll@expert.cc.purdue.edu (Laura) Subject: quit Although i have enjoyed this newsletter, there are only two more weeks of school and i am suffering from severe time constraints. please remove my name from the list. Thank you, Laura ---------------------------------------------------------- From: Jonathan Sturges <sturges@xanth.cs.odu.edu> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 91 21:46:19 EDT Subject: SUN audio files 'tanks to Keith at ingr.com. The Tom Sawyer synth file is cool, but annoyingly too short!! (it tends to tease... not to please! my brain wants to here the rest of the song, too!!!!) Anyway, I wanted to point out (because I did not know) that when you get the file from the server in the mail, it is in ASCII form and must be put into binary. First, save the letter as a file. Then, edit out the header; make it so the very first line of the file is the one that says 'begin 777 tsawyer_synth.aud' or something like that. Save the file like that. Finally, type 'uudecode <filename>' and it will make the sound file. To play it (at least, on ODU's system), you can use the Play program found in the /usr/demo/SOUND directory, or use SoundTool. Keith: question for ya. Do you know which pins in the 8-pin mini-DIN Audio Input/Output jack on the Suns are for audio input? I am planning to build my own cable, but could not find this hook-up info in the SPARCstation-1 manuals. Mail me at: sturges@xanth.cs.odu.edu if you know! Lata... Rat ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 91 22:03:51 -0400 From: snarkboy@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Snarkboy!) I definitely have to get some more Rush so I can quit talking about 2112. Towards the end, we indeed have a great tragedy. Ron Rader, you injected the point that perhaps "We have assumed control..." is spoken by the Priests or "collectivism by force." You present a plausible idea, but still we must look at the meaning of 'assume.' _Assume_ can, of course, be an assumption (no definition needed, I assume.) or it can also be an acquisition, a taking over of control. The Priests of the Temples of Syrinx already ruled the land, suppressed the people, and tried to make a supreme Utopia -- the were in command. When we hear the line about taking over the control of this land and all of the universe, we can only see (my own narrow-mind) that it must be by an outside force. Since we (I, and maybe you?) have now assumed it not to be the Priests, we can ASSUME that it was the once- leaders, the Elder Race of Man. "Frankie say, 'No more.'" --Snark! ---------------------------------------------------------- From: Kenneth Mark Maxham <max@owlnet.rice.edu> Subject: Rand and 2112 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 91 21:37:02 CDT (I posted this a while back, but it seems appropriate again.) My friend Rich and I were playing 2112 for a mutual friend who was curious about Rush. After the line "... spills over", Rich said, "Of course, what he *should* be doing is dynamiting the temples ..." I got a good laugh out of that. I don't know if Rand would have disapproved, exactly; obviously that character would not have been a Rand hero, but obviously not everyone in her books was a hero. max | Mark Maxham | No, his mind is not for rent, to any god or government | | max@rice.edu | ... he knows changes aren't permanent. But change is. | ---------------------------------------------------------- From: Robert B Simmon <presto@rpi.edu> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 91 22:46:27 EDT Subject: literary interpretations I'd have to agree with your English teacher for the most psrt, SNARK! As somone who has written a (very small) bit of fivction, I put A LOT of neat little things in my stories. I can only assume that a real, (paid) author (of any quality whatsoever, romances, action novels, and, unfortunately some pulp sci-fifi (oops) seem to be marketed to the lowest common denominator) would put A LOT more meaning into his or her work. This is especially true (IMHO) of poetry, with its much shorter length. I would disagree with your teacherthat there was ONE "correct" interpretation, with all art, the viewere/listener/reader brings his or hewr own experiences to teh piece. there isn't a single interpretation. -rob or redline or cinnamonhead ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 91 22:51:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nicholas G. Alexander" <na0u+@andrew.cmu.edu> Subject: Re: 04/18/91 - The National Midnight Star #218 I am a bit trashed, and listening to Oingo-Boingo, so I felt that it would be a wonderful time to post to the Rush board... Let's go for the stream of conciousness effect (Spelling optional...) Rush is an awesome band. "Singer/Screamer" Geddy Lee deserves far more credit from folks than he gets. So his voice can be compared to the squeals of a toutured squirl. Some of us LIKE tortured squirls. In a metaphysical sense, of course. Speaking of squirls, has anyone noticed how much geddy looks like one on the, um, Hold your Fire tape jacket? Alex rocks. Period. The classical bit at the begining of La Villa Strangiato is just one showcase of his great talent. And his fashion sense through the years.. manufique! Neil! What the hell can you say about Neil? Ann Raynd is quite possibly one of the best people I can think of to be influenced by. But look at how his lyrics have changed over the years, from a direct interpretation to a display of how he incorperates her thoughts into his own system of values. (Pretty deep for drunken rambling, 'eh?) And the man can play drums, too. What more could we ask for. Anyway... um, I enjoy reading this board. I seldom agree with the posters. My interpretations of the music are oft quite different than those posted. But it is good to see how people interpret. Let's you pull the Neil/Raynd type thing. By the way, those of you who listen to nothing but Rush are missing out on a lot of good music. Take it from someone who did the same thing all the way through High School. Beavercreek high school. What a lousy name. Anyway, there is a lot of music out there that is not the same as Rush that is JUST AS GOOD. not the same. not a replacement. But GREAT STUFF. Take Oingo Boingo (i see the flames now) "Life would be soo boring without Nasty Habits" How can one not respect a line like that. And Queensryche's new album.. That album rocks out. And sinead skinhead oconner, with her, to me, objectional politics and beautiful, incredible voice and lyrics. Broaden your horizens! Live! Go out and buy a Front 242 album and force yourself to listen to it 4500 times. ARRRRGHHHHHH!!!!!!!! I think I'll.... DONT FORGET AC/DC!!!!!! I think I'll have another beer/ Blearily yours, Nick ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 91 08:46:00 EST Subject: Marillion From: DSchmidt.311@postman.gsfc.nasa.gov! I see there are a few serious Marillion fans out there! I think the reason that they were booed off the stage at the Rush Radio City Music Hall Shows was simply because they were unknown. Also, their music, like Rush's, may not be appreciated the first time it is heard. Non-pop type music may not catch your ear the first time through. I have to admit, I didn't like it at the time. But I have heard a few tunes since then, and I would like to hear more! BTW: That was my first Rush concert, and it was amazing! A few years later, I got a hold of a bootleg of that concert, and it happened to be taped the same night I was there! ---------------------------------------------------------- From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@inmos.com> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 91 17:08:23 BST Subject: 2112 and Trees and a few other things Recent NMS's seem to be piling up bits that niggle me, so here goes for a set of comments. Ron Rader (lr@bbt.com) discusses 2112, saying that the "We have assumed control" bit at the end doesn't sound like a benevolent Elder Race returning, but the priests re-asserting their control. (Which is contrary to how most of the previous postings have seen it.) I always read this as be a flash back to how the whole society started, with a dictator assuming control, and the staying there. I don't think that the protagonist created any disturbance in the society that would be near revolutionary, and thus requiring the priest's reassertion. Any way if so, they would have said "We have RESUMED control". The menacing tone of the voice does not at all sound like a Good Thing, and, as Ron says, external control goes against Neil's writing (obvious example being Freewill). The trees, (which is one of my favourites), is rather similar, come to think of it. External control has been used to even things out. It always seemed to me to be saying that that isn't a solution. The problem being misunderstanding of the other's point of view, and arrogance of ones own. Though, I must admit to some disquiet about the solution, because it seems that only the Oaks suffered, may be the Maples get sunstroke later :-) It never occured to me to be about Canada and Britain. BTW The repatriation of the Canadian constitution in 1982 could have become a big deal. Prior to that, (I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong here), the Canadian government was appointed by a governor who was responsible to Britain (not sure if that's the Crown, or the UK Government of the day, probably a fishy area anyway). The governor had the power to dismiss the government. This meant that, if required, Britain could impose it's will on Canada. If you think this isn't a big deal, find out about the Australian debacle a few years back (Australia still has a governor), where the (Labour I think) Government was about to resign, and hold a general election, but before it did the govornor dismissed it. Caused a "constitutional crisis" and moved many Aussies to want full independence a la Canada. That's enough of a politico flamefest, this isn't the place to carry on. Didn't Canada get a new flag too? Finally I've always pronouced YYZ as wie wie zee, inspite of being British, 'cos it rolls off the tongue better. Kind of blends into the instrumental itself. (YYZ would be Yankee Yankee Zulu in ham speak.) Nathan Nathan M Sidwell, INMOS Ltd, UK JANET: nathan@uk.co.inmos Generic disclaimer applies INTERNET: nathan@inmos.co.uk This space unintentionally filled Get real -- this is 1978! ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 91 10:54:29 PDT From: Mark Lent <lent@stat.washington.edu> Subject: Opening bands getting booed off stage Someone mentioned that Marillion got booed off stage opening for Rush. Then someone else replied they couldn't understand why an intelligent audience could dare do something like that. Well, I just wanted to say that at the one Rush concert I have ever attended (sad, I wish it were more), the opening act on May 21, 1986 in the Seattle Coliseum was the Fabulous T-Birds and did they ever get booed off of the stage! People were throwing things on stage continuously as the poor guys were trying to show just how Tuff Enough they could be on stage. I had to agree, the T-Birds just didn't hit the right spot. My perception is that Rush is better off without an opener. I doubt anybody would complain to hear another hour of Rush, but I suppose that is expecting too much. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mark Lent "Oh yeah, well mine goes up to TWELVE!" ---------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Neil on Witch Hunt Date: Fri, 19 Apr 91 13:38:01 CDT From: mark@duke.b23b.ingr.com (Mark Brubaker) Just a few comments... First, since this is my first post, I feel I should tell you where I'm coming from with regards to Rush. I first got interested in the band in 1980 just before PeW was released. My first album was Hemispheres, and needless to say, I was hooked. In High School, I had plenty of friends who liked the band, and we listened very intently to every part of every album. The day of a concert, I would listen to every song in order on every album before the show. (Very time consuming now!) At the shows, we all knew every song by the first few notes. I was very into the band. In college however, I didn't have any friends that were Rush fans. I still bought every album and listened to them myself, but without other people to talk to about it, it just wasn't the same. Now, I'm getting blown away by Rush once again. I started reading the NMS recently, and it has caused me to start to *really* listen to the band again. (It's also cost me a good bit of money -- going back and buying old stuff on CD, and buying videos etc...) I've found stuff in some of the more recent albums that I never knew was there! OK, so on to my subject for this post. Because of the recent discussion of "Witch hunt" on MP, I went out and bought it on CD. (By the way, this was probably my favorite album when I was in High School, but I never bought the album for myself until last night. I always had a tape of a friends copy) In High School, we had tried to figure out what is said at the beginning of "Witch hunt", but with little success. It's much easier now with a good CD player. In NMS #215, dangerous dave writes: >and now, i have a question: >what is said at the vvery beginning of "Witch Hunt"? >there is some murmuring, and it sounds kinda like: >"[can't figure it out].... Rush in Ft. Lauderdale" >am i close? The part that you think is 'Ft. Lauderdale' is the main part I couldn't figure out. If I stick 'Ft. Lauderdale' into what I think is said, here's what I get: "It's time for us to stand up to Ft. Lauderdale. We've got to protect our children!" After that, I can't figure anything out. I know no one can be sure what is said here, but I can't help but laugh thinking of a drunken Neil late at night in a studio ranting and raving about college students on spring break etc... Listen to the part yourself and see if you don't think that's what is said here. The part starts about 24 seconds into the song. (OK, I know this is getting long, but...) Another purchase last night was the ASOH video. There has been some talk recently about things Alex said during "La Villa" that were censored out and the 'Catch a Fish' quote. It brings back memories of a show I saw at the Pittsburgh Civic Arena back in (I think) 1984 during the P/G tour. I was lucky enough to be in the second row (actually this just meant that I had a body smashed between me and the security wall) and I was directly in front of Geddy. The thing that was interesting, was that he never shut up during the whole show. He sang through just about everything. To the rest of the audience, this would not have been noticable because he was moving around and his mic was off (except for the 'real' lyrics of course). He was singing all sorts of weird stuff. There are parts in the ASOH video where you can see him doing some of this. I remember being able to clearly hear Geddy singing really wild stuff. It amazed me that he could sing this stuff and still play bass and keyboards and everything else he has his hands on during a show. I wish I could remember better some of the things he sang, but it certainly doesn't surprise me that Geddy says "Catch a fish!" -Mark Brubaker ORQ: "the cosmic is largely comic" ORQ #2: "All of us do time in the gutter, Dreamers turn to look at the cars" ----------------------------------------------------------
To submit material to The National Midnight Star, send mail to: rush@syrinx.umd.edu For administrative matters (additions, deletions, changes, and questions), send mail to: rush-request@syrinx.umd.edu There is now anonymous ftp access available on Syrinx. The network address to ftp to is: syrinx.umd.edu or 128.8.2.114 When you've connected, userid is "anonymous", password is <your userid>. Once you've successfully logged on, change directory (cd) to 'rush'. There is also a mail server available (for those unable or unwilling to ftp). For more info, send email with the subject line of HELP to: server@ingr.com These requests are processed nightly. Use a subject line of MESSAGE to send a note to the server keeper or to deposit a file into the archive. The contents of The National Midnight Star are solely the opinions and comments of the individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the authors' management, or the mailing list management. Copyright The Rush Fans Mailing List, 1991. Editor, The National Midnight Star (Rush Fans Mailing List) ******************************************** End of The National Midnight Star Number 219 ********************************************